Technology Collaboration Programme by IEA logo

IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme

Background

 

Geological storage of CO2 as a means to mitigate global warming would entail capture of CO2 from a range of point source industrial emissions. Capture technology represents the major cost element of the CCS chain and the required purity of CO2 can have a major bearing on actual capture costs.  Impurities in the CO2 stream have the potential to affect the efficiency and safety of transport and storage systems, for example through increased risks associated with corrosion, or changes in the phase behaviour of the CO2 stream.

 

The presence of impurities is likely to have a significant effect on the phase behaviour or CO2 streams, with implications for the design and operation of pipelines and injection wells. The presence of impurities could also pose a significant threat of increased corrosion of pipeline and well materials.

 

The presence of impurities in the CO2 stream may have an effect on all types of geological storage scenarios, especially in terms of changes in storage capacity and injectivity due to changes in phase behaviour with respect to pure CO2. In addition, impurities could have a significant effect on injectivity through geochemical reactions in the vicinity of injection wells. Geochemical effects such as dissolution of CO2 and reactions with minerals may determine the long term fate of injected CO2, especially CO2 injected into deep saline formations; and thus the effects of impurities on geochemistry may affect the risk profile of storage sites, as geochemical reactions are widely seen as a key mechanism for the stabilisation of pressure and brine displacement. Geochemical reactions also have the potential to affect the integrity of caprock sequences above storage complexes.

 

IEA GHG Report PH/4-32 (2004) looked at the maximum level of impurities which might be expected in captured CO2 from a wide range of fuels and from a selection of the contending capture processes; there has been a considerable advance since in the understanding of purity in CO2 captured using oxy-combustion processes. It is now unlikely that SO2 and NOx would be co-captured with CO2 for transport and storage at the levels previously suggested of 0.5 – 3%.

 

Natural Resources Canada, were commissioned by IEAGHG and GCCSI in 2009 to undertake a study, aiming to provide an overview of the effects of impurities on storage, with key issues and limiting factors highlighted.  The study will also aim to identify the current state of knowledge and/or gaps and recommend further research priorities on these topics.

Conclusions

 

In the studied scenarios of impure CO2 streams where O2, N2 and Ar have the highest levels, the greatest impact of impurities is physical, i.e., reducing storage efficiency and injectivity.

 

The most significant effect is the reduction of storage capacity. It has been shown that the non-condensable impurities cause reduction of CO2 capacity by a degree greater than their molar fractions when the temperature is not high above the critical temperature of CO2. Particularly, there is a maximum reduction of the storage capacity in a certain pressure range, where the capacity can drop to below 40 % for the 15% light impurities case compared with that of pure CO2. The injectivity of impure CO2 streams reduces as a result of lower density. However, due to the compensation by increased viscosity the reduction of injectivity is smaller than that of storage capacity. In the studied scenarios using the 15% light impurities case, the average reduction of injectivity is 6%, with the largest reduction 26%. The higher buoyancy of impure CO2 streams will reduce the efficiency of CO2 dissolution in formation water and CO2 trapping in rock pores, and thus has the potential reduce the security of CO2 storage in the near to medium terms.

 

With regard to chemical effects on rocks, the most significant species are SOx, NOx and H2S. NOx can catalyze the oxidation of SO2 to sulphuric acid. The impact of SO2 on reduction of rock porosity and injectivity appears much smaller than previously thought, because its contact with water is limited with the development of the dry-out zone. NOx will also promote dissolution of minerals, but will not cause precipitation and therefore reduction of rock porosity. H2S on its own has not been found to reduce the injectivity in acid gas injection operations and computer simulations. However, if H2S and SO2 are co-injected, deposition of elemental sulphur, in the pores over the whole injection period can be a serious concern.

 

For evaluation of chemical effects on caprock integrity, thermochemical calculations show that SOx and NOx increase dissolution of carbonate rocks and aluminosilicate rocks. However, for CO2 streams considered in this study where SOx and NOx concentrations are within 200 ppm, the impact on the dissolution of the rocks is insignificant.

 

Corrosion of injection well materials may not be serious when the CO2 stream is dry, due to desiccation of the well zone in the injection period. However, after termination of injection and return of water, corrosion by the acidic impurities could be an issue of concern.

 

The results of the study have implications on site selection for different CO2 streams, i.e. a relatively shallow storage site may be appropriate for a low impurity stream, whereas a high impurity stream may reduce the storage capacity by a significant amount. There are also implications for designing pipeline systems, for multiple CO2 streams and mixing of the streams.

 

Recommendations

 

The literature on the effects of impurities on the geological storage of CO2 is currently limited and the some of the theoretical effects examined in the study cannot yet be verified by experimental data. It is important that IEAGHG keeps updated on further experimental work which would be able to verify the effects.

 

The outcome of this study may have implications on site selection for different impure streams of CO2 and injection of different streams into the same storage site.

 

IEAGHG should ensure that adequate attention is paid to these topics through future storage network meetings and by the study programme.

This report is free to download.